Atom 1.0!

Yay!

I think you’ll agree it looks nicer than the old one.

I don’t see a real difference. I preferred the bigger font on the old layout, and frankly I find the grey boxes of metadata useless at best and distracting at works, particularly on the main page where there are so many of them providing irrelevant targets to the scanning eye. So overall I think it’s a slight change for the worse, but not enough so that I’d care.

My only actual complaints are the same as I have with just about any Typo blog: that I always have to click “leave url/email”, and that for whatever reason Firefox refuses to autocomplete these fields.

I agree on the “leave url/email” thing. I will ditch it.

Also agree on the grey metaboxes. Will tone them down a bit.

On the font size. Here’s the old stylesheet:

font-size: 62.5%;
font-family : 'Bitstream Vera Sans', 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial, 'sans-serif';

New stylesheet:

font: normal 12px "Bitstream Vera Sans", "lucida grande", verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;

So whether it’s smaller or bigger depends on your default font size… (for me the new one is bigger).

useless at best and distracting at works

Did I really write that?

Also, I just saw that a bunch of your posts when from fulltext to summary-only – aww.

Re-enabled fulltext feeds.

I’ve seen what the old site did on Sunny’s pc (when you ask for a small font size, Ubuntu knows you really mean it), and I’m sure he’s glad for the new larger font style too.

But I’m sure Julian’s gonna gripe about the use of a fixed pixel (? WTF kind font size is measured in pixels? Shouldn’t this be pt, like Gutenberg intended?) height, rather than being proporsional… if he even notices (shh, maybe he won’t).

One thing you might want to look into is the total absence of space between the article title and byline (in Firefox, are they drawn over each other? It’s hard to tell with the top of the ascenders being horizontally separated from the descenders) vs the larger gap between the site title and subtitle. Maybe these should use the same style?

And finally: woot! Previews!

Excellent suggestion but as you correctly surmise, there are some issues with comment revision. The authentication problem is probably solvable – the site could just hand you a cookie which would authenticate you were the author of a given comment. This could be valid for N minutes which would let you edit the comment. I’ll put this on the to-do list.

I’ve just migrated to Typo too for similar reasons. Now the blog is up it’s time to pimp my scribbish.

Sadly my host doesn’t support Mongrel yet so I’m making do with FastCGI – it’s not too bad I guess but I pity the sucker who gets whacked with the 10-15 second load time after ther fcgi process is periodically sighup’d.

It’s good to run into you via your blog. Just the other day I remembering my time at [previous job] (how did fun and boredom coexist so peacfully?) and wondered what had become of you after your move to NJ. Drop me a line sometime.

Michael.

So far I’m pretty happy with the migration. So far the only downside has been the need to upgrade my hosting plan to include SSH. Wordpress can be managed through an FTP-only interface, but not so for Typo (or any other RoR tech AFAICT).

Removed the duplicate post and possibly-obscure reference to my current employer (yes I’m still there).